Continuous Improvement in Project Management: Evaluating Lessons Learned Strategies - by STERLING TOMAS

 Continuous Improvement in Project Management: Evaluating Lessons Learned Strategies

-by STERLING TOMAS

Lessons Learned Conducted After Each Project Phase vs Sprint Review

In project management, conducting lessons learned is a crucial process for ensuring continuous improvement and increasing project success. There are two common approaches to conducting lessons learned: after each project phase and during sprint reviews.

Lessons Learned After Each Project Phase

Conducting lessons learned after each project phase allows teams to identify and reflect on areas of success and areas for improvement during the current phase, before moving on to the next one. This can help to ensure that lessons learned are incorporated into the next phase and prevent the same mistakes from being repeated. Additionally, conducting lessons learned at the end of each phase can help to increase the speed of decision-making, as teams are able to quickly identify and address any issues that arise.

One benefit of conducting lessons learned after each project phase is that it provides an opportunity for teams to take a step back and reflect on the overall progress of the project. This can help to identify any areas of the project that are falling behind schedule or where resources need to be redirected, allowing teams to make necessary adjustments.

However, one drawback of this approach is that it can be time-consuming and may slow down the progress of the project. Teams may spend too much time reflecting on the past instead of focusing on the present and future. Additionally, there may be a lack of follow-up or action taken on the lessons learned, making the process less effective.

Sprint Review

Sprint reviews are a key aspect of the Agile methodology and are typically conducted at the end of each sprint. During sprint reviews, teams reflect on the work completed during the sprint and identify areas for improvement. This approach allows teams to quickly identify and address any issues that arise, increasing the speed of decision-making.

One benefit of sprint reviews is that they help to ensure that teams are constantly improving and making progress. The focus is on the work completed during the current sprint, making it easier to identify areas for improvement and make necessary adjustments. Additionally, sprint reviews allow teams to demonstrate their work and get feedback from stakeholders, improving transparency and communication.

However, one drawback of sprint reviews is that they may not provide enough time for in-depth reflection. Teams may only be able to identify the most pressing issues, rather than all areas of improvement. Additionally, sprint reviews may only be effective if the team is already practicing Agile methodology, as they are a key aspect of this approach.

In summary, conducting lessons learned after each project phase and during sprint reviews both have their benefits and drawbacks. While lessons learned after each project phase can provide an opportunity for in-depth reflection, sprint reviews allow for quicker identification and resolution of issues. Ultimately, the approach that is best for a particular project will depend on the project’s goals and constraints, as well as the team’s practices and preferences.

"Why did the Scrum Master cross the road? To get to the other side of the sprint review, of course!”

In conclusion, conducting lessons learned is a crucial aspect of project management, and both after each project phase and during sprint reviews have their benefits and drawbacks. It is important for teams to choose the approach that works best for their project and to consistently reflect on areas of success and improvement.

#projectmanagement #lessonslearned #continuousimprovement #sprintretrospectives #productivity #transparency #communication #decisionmaking #adaptation #executives #stakeholders #PMs #PgMs #PMOs